How will the city of tomorrow adapt and reuse the city of today? I do not think we ask that question broadly enough, and our day-to-day, property-specific incrementalism can certainly overshoot the greatest lessons from history. A hometown here’s an example transported me from Seattle to Croatia for inspiration about why we need to think beyond limited geographies, time frames and lifetimes once we discuss urban redevelopment options.
Recently, the National Trust for Historic Preservation’s Seattle-based Preservation Green Lab made urbanist media headlines (including Emily Badger’s Atlantic Cities story) which has a report stating the environmental important things about green retrofits of historic buildings, as compared to new, state-of-the-art, energy-efficient construction. A local church restored as townhouses joined the list of intriguing Seattle adaptive reuse projects usual for national trends.
Almost simultaneously, Seattle Times columnist Nicole Brodeur described a protest-free goodbye to a neighborhood icon in my Seattle neighborhood. A 112-year-old repair garage and offices (demolished last Friday) will quickly become the nostalgically named Pike Station, composed of new townhouses, complete with a courtyard and intermixed retail.
The purported upshot of the local story, that the building had a good life and the new me is commendable, is clear in the headline: “Sometimes it’s OK permit an old landmark go.”
How did our predecessors handle these complaints in simpler times, when reuse was obviously a practical necessity? What can we study on those stories? As our surroundings evolve, are we able to create incentives and inspiration for transformational locations where are sustainable in form, function and awareness of the past?
When considering these questions, there is certainly one place that needs a hard look: Split, Croatia. Amid the existing town center and ruins of the retirement palace of the Roman Emperor Diocletian, adaptive reuse is obvious. Split is a place which began as something else entirely from what it is today, yet endures in the new clothing of another age, more juxtaposition than reinvention. I had been lucky enough to first visit Split in 1968, within the old Yugoslavia, and to return more often than not in the years that followed. Today, in case you planning to come in Split you are able to stay in Split hotel.
It’s not a stretch to convey that its impressionable story explains my legal operate in urban redevelopment. There, the survival and reuse of historic elements tell a valuable tale of sustainability.
Right after 300 A.D., on the webpage of Split’s town center, workers completed Diocletian’s Palace. Diocletian was the very first Roman Emperor to voluntarily abdicate, and retire nowadays in this sense; he viewed the palace like a purposeful respite from power in his home region, possibly for medical reasons.
After Diocletian’s death, the palace was a refuge for exiled imperial family. Then, after destruction of the nearby Roman city of Salona by the Avars and Slavs at the start of the 7th century, the palace was a shelter for fleeing citizens, later a medieval town, a Renaissance regional center, and finally a major city, with core aspects of the palace still prominent today.
How was this scene created? Essentially, the palace, which spanned almost 10 acres, contained enough aspects of classical urbanity-including the gridded crossroads of a military camp (the standard castrum and its standard roads, the decumanus and cardo), along with several ceremonial spaces and religious structures-that when repopulated following the destruction of Salona, it became easily adaptable as to what we now consider urban uses.
This unintentional convertibility shows a unique evolution over time. A mausoleum was a cathedral, the cardo became the winding medieval street that is still today, the crossing of the decumanus and cardo at the peristyle (a classical courtyard beneath the Emperor’s apartments) became a baptistry, public square and historic urban center, and the Emperor’s apartments became the structural framework of an residential area.
Due to this fascinating progression, Split has drawn visitors for centuries. The Scottish architect Robert Adam profiled its unrivaled preservation of Roman architecture in 1764, through collected drawings, viewable here, often known as inspiration for the Georgian architectural tradition of elements of London, Bath and Bristol.
Within the last century, many excavations and publications by local and American teams have admirably documented the palace’s background and transformation (including the often cited work of Jerko and Tomas Marasovic). In a very 1970 book, the Marasovic brothers advocated a universal message while continuing investigation, discovery and restoration to “ensuring…renewed function from the context of a modern urban community.”
The confluence of past and provide discussed here is not often mentioned within the American dialogue. This is a missed opportunity. I think that visiting Diocletian’s Palace and reflecting on how the old can blend (and, the truth is, be adapted to suit) the modern provides incomparable perspective.
This will add value to today’s discussion of familiar building restoration approaches, and even already innovative, largely replacement-style redevelopment of areas like a former military base, an airport (e.g. the previous Stapleton Airport in Denver), or perhaps institutional campus. The scale of adaptation in Split confirms how humans could be at home and enriched by large-scale incorporation of history.
In other cities, some historic urban cores survive, there are many examples, from Istanbul to Venice to Jerusalem. Old towns, often within formerly defensive walls, become functional, large-scale artifacts, some evolved cities and some tourist meccas. In contrast to Split, these were always, first and foremost, cities or towns.
Continue, we should design and regulate in a way that the inadvertence described here becomes more purposeful, enabling sustainable reuse on a broader scale. Examples include zoning and building code provisions that anticipate land assembly instead of property-by-property approaches that allow for convertible uses in buildings, a substantial mixture of old and new materials, and the outright recognition that both private and public spaces can realize new uses as time passes.
Lenders, often the true drivers of development, should view the benefits of such reactivated places. Indeed, some states and cities have policies encouraging the idea of adaptive reuse.
Throughout history, cities have fulfilled central cultural, economic and religious roles as both centers of settlement and qualitative measures of human habitat. To reinvent them (or juxtapose the very best of the past), we need to know where were and where we are going, at greater building scale, writes tagza.com.